Loading project workspace…
Investor demonstration · read-only
Read-only demonstration. Four sanitised or hypothetical engineering projects. Each states its own validation status; nothing shown is engineer approved.
WORKSPACE
Projects
Engineering projects in this workspace. Each card shows the project's own saved evidence; verification and approval status are stated on every project.
Project records
Project evidence · Native Revit MEP geometry, Run 4 (RVT 1ce22c7e, export f05a5d66), with the SYNTHETIC architectural model (not architect-issued), in the Hexanta 3D viewer Mechanical (HVAC) design
London Office Mechanical Design
London, UK (synthetic office building)
Native Revit model and Stage 4 GAs generated on Autodesk APS from IESVE loads
- Native GA checks (P07)
- 117 / 117
- Proposed model checks
- 4,053, 0 failures
- Calculation formulas
- 9,762, 0 mismatches
- BOQ (illustrative)
- £350,723
Technical validation statusOpen project →NATIVE REVIT / IESVE EVIDENCE — technical demonstration frozen; engineer approval outstanding
12 current results · 4 from the native tool6 PASS3 PARTIAL2 BLOCKED1 NOT TESTEDEngineering approval: OUTSTANDING
Project evidence · Native IESVE MicroFlo screenshots, run DC00O-R1 (cfd-DC00-20261024-r2), cropped Mechanical — CFD and energy
Data Centre CFD Analysis
London, UK (synthetic data hall)
Native CFD of a synthetic data hall: 12.5 % less supply air with rack inlets still 18-27 °C - not engineering validated
- Max rack inlet (baseline / optimised)
- 21.62 / 21.49 °C
- Supply air
- −12.5 %
- Modelled cooling-energy saving
- 12.7 % (upper bound, assumed equipment)
- Validation gates passed
- 3 of 8
Technical validation statusOpen project →NOT ENGINEERING VALIDATED — native CFD converged; validation gates partly failed
23 current results · 11 from the native tool11 PASS2 PARTIAL10 FAILEngineering approval: OUTSTANDING
Project evidence · Native IESVE ApacheHVAC screenshot (compliance-NATIVE-T24-RUN2-20261025, cropped) and a Hexanta plot of the run 2 Results Summary; result NOT ACCEPTED Energy & building-code compliance
San Francisco Office Energy & Compliance
San Francisco, CA, USA (hypothetical site; Title 24 CZ 3, ASHRAE 3C)
Native Title 24 2025 workflow automated end-to-end in IESVE; software 'complies' result rejected on engineering review
- Native T24 runs
- 2 (both rejected)
- Fan share of run 2 margin
- 94.5 % (≈3 % without)
- Proposed EUI
- 90.2 kWh/m²·yr (not accepted)
- PV needed
- ≥ 21.1 kWdc (offline)
Technical validation statusOpen project →NOT COMPLIANT / NOT ACCEPTED — native Title 24 runs rejected; official report not generated; ASHRAE PRM blocked
10 current results · 7 from the native tool1 PASS4 PARTIAL1 FAIL3 BLOCKED1 NOT TESTEDEngineering approval: OUTSTANDING
Project evidence · Native Simulex playback frames (run HXM01-ALT-WARN-A1) and a Hexanta plot of the Simulex results files (simulex-HXM01-20261024); hypothetical building, assumed inputs Fire engineering — evacuation (egress) modelling
Los Angeles Hotel Fire Evacuation
Los Angeles area, California, USA (hypothetical site)
Earlier warning cut mean evacuation time by 64 % in native Simulex runs (assumed inputs)
- Baseline mean
- 886.5 s
- Staff warning mean
- 318.2 s
- Hotel runs
- 15 (3 per scenario)
- Occupants
- 29 (assumed)
Technical validation statusOpen project →NATIVE SIMULEX RESULTS (17 runs) — inputs assumed; CP1–CP4 NOT APPROVED; no ASET/fire model
11 current results · 7 from the native tool8 PARTIAL3 NOT TESTEDEngineering approval: OUTSTANDING
About the London Office run history
The original Workflow 1 project (8 design runs, criteria revisions and native jobs) lives in a separate database. Its records are shown read-only in each project's Run history, from the manifest-verified history snapshot; this application does not connect to that database or present those runs as runs of another project.