Investor demonstration · read-only

Read-only demonstration. Four sanitised or hypothetical engineering projects. Each states its own validation status; nothing shown is engineer approved.

MECHANICAL — CFD AND ENERGY · CASE STUDY

Data Centre CFD Analysis — Results

NOT ENGINEERING VALIDATED — native CFD converged; validation gates partly failed

Results

Validation gates

Computed status NOT ENGINEERING VALIDATED. Both designs pass convergence, rack-inlet completeness and grid quality, and FAIL mass conservation (flows prescribed), energy balance (sampled, gaps -25.5 % / -7.5 %), boundary read-back, physical plausibility (no field export) and mesh sensitivity.

Validation gates

ResultOriginSoftware · dateVerdictStatusSource · evidence hashEngineering approval
Computed study statusValidation gateNOT ENGINEERING VALIDATED - computed from the gates (validation/gate.py + verdict.py); a manifest cannot claim more. Both designs fail 5 of 8 gate checks.Hexanta offlineHexanta CFD engine (hexanta_api.cfd) branch feat/cfd-dc01-engine2026-10-24FAILexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/study-manifest.study.mdsha256 3a1534d76fb3…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
CFD gate: ConvergenceValidation gateDC00B PASS; DC00O PASS. Residuals and monitors within criteria on both designs.Hexanta offlineHexanta CFD engine (hexanta_api.cfd) branch feat/cfd-dc01-engine2026-10-24PASSexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/study-manifest.study.mdsha256 3a1534d76fb3…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
CFD gate: Mass conservationValidation gateDC00B FAIL; DC00O FAIL. Flows are prescribed boundary settings, not a solver flow report: conservation not shown.Hexanta offlineHexanta CFD engine (hexanta_api.cfd) branch feat/cfd-dc01-engine2026-10-24FAILexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/study-manifest.study.mdsha256 3a1534d76fb3…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
CFD gate: Energy balanceValidation gateDC00B FAIL; DC00O FAIL. Extract temperatures sampled, not solver-reported; gaps -25.5 % (DC00B) and -7.5 % (DC00O).Hexanta offlineHexanta CFD engine (hexanta_api.cfd) branch feat/cfd-dc01-engine2026-10-24FAILexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/study-manifest.study.mdsha256 3a1534d76fb3…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
CFD gate: Boundary consistencyValidation gateDC00B FAIL; DC00O FAIL. Model boundary values not read back programmatically.Hexanta offlineHexanta CFD engine (hexanta_api.cfd) branch feat/cfd-dc01-engine2026-10-24FAILexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/study-manifest.study.mdsha256 3a1534d76fb3…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
CFD gate: Rack inlets completeValidation gateDC00B PASS; DC00O PASS. All 4 racks monitored.Hexanta offlineHexanta CFD engine (hexanta_api.cfd) branch feat/cfd-dc01-engine2026-10-24PASSexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/study-manifest.study.mdsha256 3a1534d76fb3…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
CFD gate: Physical plausibilityValidation gateDC00B FAIL; DC00O FAIL. Field temperature range not available (no field export).Hexanta offlineHexanta CFD engine (hexanta_api.cfd) branch feat/cfd-dc01-engine2026-10-24FAILexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/study-manifest.study.mdsha256 3a1534d76fb3…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
CFD gate: Grid qualityValidation gateDC00B PASS; DC00O PASS. Within limits (60 x 48 x 30, aspect 1:1).Hexanta offlineHexanta CFD engine (hexanta_api.cfd) branch feat/cfd-dc01-engine2026-10-24PASSexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/study-manifest.study.mdsha256 3a1534d76fb3…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
CFD gate: Mesh sensitivityValidation gateDC00B FAIL; DC00O FAIL. DC00B: no refined-grid comparison; DC00O: top inlets not monotonic over three grids.Hexanta offlineHexanta CFD engine (hexanta_api.cfd) branch feat/cfd-dc01-engine2026-10-24FAILexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/study-manifest.study.mdsha256 3a1534d76fb3…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
Room energy balance (sampled at the extract plane)ValidationNOT ESTABLISHED: heat removed vs represented rack heat -7.5 % (optimised, base grid), -6.6 % (refined grid), -25.5 % (baseline, samples inside the impinging jet). Point samples 0.15 m below the extract face; the solver exports no field data.Hexanta offlineHexanta CFD engine (hexanta_api.cfd) branch feat/cfd-dc01-engine2026-10-24FAILexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/study-manifest.study.mdsha256 3a1534d76fb3…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded

Airflow and temperature - rack inlets (solver cell monitors, °C)

RackDC00B-R6 maxDC00O-R1 maxDC00O-F1 max
A0121.6221.4921.53
B0121.1421.4521.53
A02 (mid only)20.2720.0520.07
B02 (mid only)20.0320.0320.06

All monitored inlets lie in the 18-27 °C range used by the study (from a public summary; the licensed edition is not held). The defensible statement is "no degradation with 12.5 % less supply air", not "cooler inlets": the 0.13 K change in the maximum is about the size of the grid and sampling effect. The baseline flow field shows the floor jet short-circuiting to the ceiling extract above the cold aisle.

Annual energy

ResultOriginSoftware · dateVerdictStatusSource · evidence hashEngineering approval
DC00B annual energy simulationAnnual energyBuild, Apache input (.der) and physics gates PASS. Cooling-system electricity 141,449 kWh/yr (chillers 97,867 + fans 43,582) with ASSUMED SEER 4.0 and SFP 1.5 W/(l/s); room held at 28 °C.Native tool outputIESVE (ApacheSim) 2026 (trial licence, internal evaluation)2026-10-24PASSexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/dsm/DC00B/export-DC00B.jsonsha256 111c064c2e42…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
DC00O annual energy simulationAnnual energyBuild, .der and physics gates PASS. Cooling-system electricity 123,467 kWh/yr (chillers 94,270 + fans 29,197); fan power from the ASSUMED fan law n = 3.Native tool outputIESVE (ApacheSim) 2026 (trial licence, internal evaluation)2026-10-24PASSexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/dsm/DC00O/export-DC00O.jsonsha256 ea9e18412b0c…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
DC00O vs DC00B modelled energy difference (independent recalculation)Annual energyRecalculation matches IESVE. Modelled difference 17,982 kWh/yr (12.7 % of cooling-system electricity), GBP 4,495/yr at an ASSUMED 0.25 GBP/kWh. SIMULATED WITH ASSUMED EQUIPMENT MODEL - not a validated saving; upper bound (fan law n = 2 gives 12,768 kWh/yr). Apache total difference (32,368 kWh/yr) excluded: it double-counts fans.Hexanta offlineHexanta CFD engine (hexanta_api.cfd) branch feat/cfd-dc01-engine2026-10-24PARTIALexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/study-manifest.study.mdsha256 3a1534d76fb3…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
SIMULATED WITH ASSUMED EQUIPMENT MODEL

Modelled difference 17,982 kWh/yr (12.7 % of cooling-system electricity), GBP 4,495/yr at an ASSUMED 0.25 GBP/kWh. This is an upper bound from the ideal fan law (n = 3); n = 2.5 gives 15,462 kWh/yr and n = 2 gives 12,768 kWh/yr. The saving depends entirely on the ASSUMED fan model; it is not a validated saving.

DC-01 annual simulation (larger synthetic hall, no CFD)

ResultOriginSoftware · dateVerdictStatusSource · evidence hashEngineering approval
DC-01 annual simulation N1F (100 kW hall)Annual energyACCEPTED as the DC-01 dynamic-simulation baseline at software/automation level: build, .der and physics gates PASS; room 28.0 °C all year; cooling load 973,525 kWh; cooling-system electricity 352,337 kWh/yr (ASSUMED SEER 4.0, SFP 1.5). No CFD was run for DC-01.Native tool outputIESVE (ApacheSim) 2026 (trial licence, internal evaluation)2026-10-24PASSexploratorycfd-DC01-N1-DSM-20261024/out/export-DC01N1F.jsonsha256 b19d2111554a…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
DC-01 annual simulation N1EAnnual energyREJECTED by the physics gate: the Apache system airflow was outdoor air, flushing the hall (mean 21.1 °C instead of 28 °C).Native tool outputIESVE (ApacheSim) 2026 (trial licence, internal evaluation)2026-10-23FAILexploratorycfd-DC01-N1-DSM-20261024/out/export-DC01N1E.jsonsha256 a39cc869a062…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
DC-01 annual simulation N1DAnnual energyREJECTED by the input and physics gates: the Apache input held no internal-gain records (mean 13.3 °C, zero cooling).Native tool outputIESVE (ApacheSim) 2026 (trial licence, internal evaluation)2026-10-23FAILexploratorycfd-DC01-N1-DSM-20261024/out/export-DC01N1D.jsonsha256 359613614c0f…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded

Native evidence and completeness matrix

ResultOriginSoftware · dateVerdictStatusSource · evidence hashEngineering approval
DC00B-R6 baseline CFD (final)CFD runFinal baseline: DC00B-R5 field resumed with the same boundaries; all 7 residuals at the 1e-5 termination residual after 2,599 outer iterations; rack inlets 19.09-21.62 °C (max 21.62 °C), within 0.02 K of R5. Convergence only - the study is NOT ENGINEERING VALIDATED.Native tool outputIESVE (MicroFlo CFD) 2026 (trial licence, internal evaluation)2026-10-24PASSexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/cfd/DC00B-R6/HX_DC00_M1.logsha256 b03ee3d19604…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
DC00O-R1 optimised CFD (final)CFD runFinal optimised design (supply 1.05 x IT airflow, two hot-aisle extracts): all 7 residuals at 1e-5 after 653 outer iterations. Convergence only - not engineering validated.Native tool outputIESVE (MicroFlo CFD) 2026 (trial licence, internal evaluation)2026-10-24PASSexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/cfd/DC00O-R1/HX_DC00_MO.logsha256 5f26864180c4…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
DC00O-R1b rack-inlet monitor read-outCFD runConverged DC00O field resumed 1 iteration with 11 cell monitors: rack inlets 19.02-21.49 °C (max 21.49 °C); represented rack heat 9.85-9.97 kW per 10 kW rack. Values are the converged state; no stability window.Native tool outputIESVE (MicroFlo CFD) 2026 (trial licence, internal evaluation)2026-10-24PASSexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/cfd/DC00O-R1b/HX_DC00_MO.logsha256 6c564f5ac841…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
DC00O-F1 refined-mesh CFDMesh studyRefined grid 0.075 m (80 x 63 x 39 = 196,560 cells) converged after 830 iterations; rack inlets within +0.08 K of the base grid; max inlet 21.53 °C.Native tool outputIESVE (MicroFlo CFD) 2026 (trial licence, internal evaluation)2026-10-24PASSexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/cfd/DC00O-F1/HX_DC00_MOF.logsha256 86bc4b430b60…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
DC00O-C1 coarse-mesh CFDMesh studyCoarse grid 0.133 m (44 x 35 x 22 = 33,880 cells, aspect 2:1) converged after 517 iterations; third grid for the GCI study.Native tool outputIESVE (MicroFlo CFD) 2026 (trial licence, internal evaluation)2026-10-24PASSexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/cfd/DC00O-C1/HX_DC00_MOC.logsha256 a6ed0cc09169…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
Mesh sensitivity, optimised design (two-grid and three-grid GCI)Mesh studyTwo-grid comparison (86,400 vs 196,560 cells) within the ASSUMED tolerances (|dT| <= 0.2 K, speed <= 10 %). Three-grid GCI (Celik et al. 2008): low and mid inlets monotonic with GCI <= 0.1 K; top inlets not monotonic (spread <= 0.08 K). The gate check is FAIL. The baseline was solved on one grid only.Hexanta offlineHexanta CFD engine (hexanta_api.cfd) branch feat/cfd-dc01-engine2026-10-24PARTIALexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/study-manifest.study.mdsha256 3a1534d76fb3…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
Room energy balance (sampled at the extract plane)ValidationNOT ESTABLISHED: heat removed vs represented rack heat -7.5 % (optimised, base grid), -6.6 % (refined grid), -25.5 % (baseline, samples inside the impinging jet). Point samples 0.15 m below the extract face; the solver exports no field data.Hexanta offlineHexanta CFD engine (hexanta_api.cfd) branch feat/cfd-dc01-engine2026-10-24FAILexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/study-manifest.study.mdsha256 3a1534d76fb3…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
CFD gate: ConvergenceValidation gateDC00B PASS; DC00O PASS. Residuals and monitors within criteria on both designs.Hexanta offlineHexanta CFD engine (hexanta_api.cfd) branch feat/cfd-dc01-engine2026-10-24PASSexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/study-manifest.study.mdsha256 3a1534d76fb3…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
CFD gate: Mass conservationValidation gateDC00B FAIL; DC00O FAIL. Flows are prescribed boundary settings, not a solver flow report: conservation not shown.Hexanta offlineHexanta CFD engine (hexanta_api.cfd) branch feat/cfd-dc01-engine2026-10-24FAILexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/study-manifest.study.mdsha256 3a1534d76fb3…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
CFD gate: Energy balanceValidation gateDC00B FAIL; DC00O FAIL. Extract temperatures sampled, not solver-reported; gaps -25.5 % (DC00B) and -7.5 % (DC00O).Hexanta offlineHexanta CFD engine (hexanta_api.cfd) branch feat/cfd-dc01-engine2026-10-24FAILexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/study-manifest.study.mdsha256 3a1534d76fb3…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
CFD gate: Boundary consistencyValidation gateDC00B FAIL; DC00O FAIL. Model boundary values not read back programmatically.Hexanta offlineHexanta CFD engine (hexanta_api.cfd) branch feat/cfd-dc01-engine2026-10-24FAILexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/study-manifest.study.mdsha256 3a1534d76fb3…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
CFD gate: Rack inlets completeValidation gateDC00B PASS; DC00O PASS. All 4 racks monitored.Hexanta offlineHexanta CFD engine (hexanta_api.cfd) branch feat/cfd-dc01-engine2026-10-24PASSexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/study-manifest.study.mdsha256 3a1534d76fb3…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
CFD gate: Physical plausibilityValidation gateDC00B FAIL; DC00O FAIL. Field temperature range not available (no field export).Hexanta offlineHexanta CFD engine (hexanta_api.cfd) branch feat/cfd-dc01-engine2026-10-24FAILexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/study-manifest.study.mdsha256 3a1534d76fb3…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
CFD gate: Grid qualityValidation gateDC00B PASS; DC00O PASS. Within limits (60 x 48 x 30, aspect 1:1).Hexanta offlineHexanta CFD engine (hexanta_api.cfd) branch feat/cfd-dc01-engine2026-10-24PASSexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/study-manifest.study.mdsha256 3a1534d76fb3…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
CFD gate: Mesh sensitivityValidation gateDC00B FAIL; DC00O FAIL. DC00B: no refined-grid comparison; DC00O: top inlets not monotonic over three grids.Hexanta offlineHexanta CFD engine (hexanta_api.cfd) branch feat/cfd-dc01-engine2026-10-24FAILexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/study-manifest.study.mdsha256 3a1534d76fb3…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
Computed study statusValidation gateNOT ENGINEERING VALIDATED - computed from the gates (validation/gate.py + verdict.py); a manifest cannot claim more. Both designs fail 5 of 8 gate checks.Hexanta offlineHexanta CFD engine (hexanta_api.cfd) branch feat/cfd-dc01-engine2026-10-24FAILexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/study-manifest.study.mdsha256 3a1534d76fb3…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
DC00B annual energy simulationAnnual energyBuild, Apache input (.der) and physics gates PASS. Cooling-system electricity 141,449 kWh/yr (chillers 97,867 + fans 43,582) with ASSUMED SEER 4.0 and SFP 1.5 W/(l/s); room held at 28 °C.Native tool outputIESVE (ApacheSim) 2026 (trial licence, internal evaluation)2026-10-24PASSexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/dsm/DC00B/export-DC00B.jsonsha256 111c064c2e42…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
DC00O annual energy simulationAnnual energyBuild, .der and physics gates PASS. Cooling-system electricity 123,467 kWh/yr (chillers 94,270 + fans 29,197); fan power from the ASSUMED fan law n = 3.Native tool outputIESVE (ApacheSim) 2026 (trial licence, internal evaluation)2026-10-24PASSexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/dsm/DC00O/export-DC00O.jsonsha256 ea9e18412b0c…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
DC00O vs DC00B modelled energy difference (independent recalculation)Annual energyRecalculation matches IESVE. Modelled difference 17,982 kWh/yr (12.7 % of cooling-system electricity), GBP 4,495/yr at an ASSUMED 0.25 GBP/kWh. SIMULATED WITH ASSUMED EQUIPMENT MODEL - not a validated saving; upper bound (fan law n = 2 gives 12,768 kWh/yr). Apache total difference (32,368 kWh/yr) excluded: it double-counts fans.Hexanta offlineHexanta CFD engine (hexanta_api.cfd) branch feat/cfd-dc01-engine2026-10-24PARTIALexploratorycfd-DC00-20261024-r2/study-manifest.study.mdsha256 3a1534d76fb3…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
DC-01 annual simulation N1F (100 kW hall)Annual energyACCEPTED as the DC-01 dynamic-simulation baseline at software/automation level: build, .der and physics gates PASS; room 28.0 °C all year; cooling load 973,525 kWh; cooling-system electricity 352,337 kWh/yr (ASSUMED SEER 4.0, SFP 1.5). No CFD was run for DC-01.Native tool outputIESVE (ApacheSim) 2026 (trial licence, internal evaluation)2026-10-24PASSexploratorycfd-DC01-N1-DSM-20261024/out/export-DC01N1F.jsonsha256 b19d2111554a…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
DC-01 annual simulation N1EAnnual energyREJECTED by the physics gate: the Apache system airflow was outdoor air, flushing the hall (mean 21.1 °C instead of 28 °C).Native tool outputIESVE (ApacheSim) 2026 (trial licence, internal evaluation)2026-10-23FAILexploratorycfd-DC01-N1-DSM-20261024/out/export-DC01N1E.jsonsha256 a39cc869a062…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
DC-01 annual simulation N1DAnnual energyREJECTED by the input and physics gates: the Apache input held no internal-gain records (mean 13.3 °C, zero cooling).Native tool outputIESVE (ApacheSim) 2026 (trial licence, internal evaluation)2026-10-23FAILexploratorycfd-DC01-N1-DSM-20261024/out/export-DC01N1D.jsonsha256 359613614c0f…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
DC00B-R5 baseline CFD (32 °C exhaust)CFD runNOT CONVERGED to the strict target (t 1.73e-5, e 1.65e-5 vs 1e-5) at 2,500 iterations; monitors steady. Source field of the baseline figures; numbers superseded by R6.Native tool outputIESVE (MicroFlo CFD) 2026 (trial licence, internal evaluation)2026-10-24PARTIALsupersededcfd-DC00-20261024-r2/cfd/DC00B-R5/HX_DC00_M1.logsha256 413274e10830…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
DC00B-R4 baseline CFD (resumed)CFD runConverged, but the edited 32 °C exhaust was not applied (a resumed run keeps the old boundaries); superseded.Native tool outputIESVE (MicroFlo CFD) 2026 (trial licence, internal evaluation)2026-10-24FAILsupersededcfd-DC00-20261024-r2/cfd/DC00B-R4/HX_DC00_M1.logsha256 4c6fda4725f9…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
DC00B-R3 baseline CFD (regenerated)CFD runNOT CONVERGED at 1,500 iterations; airflow orientation verified; represented rack heat -16 % at 30 °C exhaust, which led to the 32 °C exhaust iteration.Native tool outputIESVE (MicroFlo CFD) 2026 (trial licence, internal evaluation)2026-10-24FAILsupersededcfd-DC00-20261024-r2/cfd/DC00B-R3/HX_DC00_M1.logsha256 eb1e153f6a32…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
DC00B-R2 baseline CFDCFD runNOT CONVERGED (iteration limit; resumed the aborted R1 field; 30 °C exhaust). Its early figures are not used.Native tool outputIESVE (MicroFlo CFD) 2026 (trial licence, internal evaluation)2026-10-24FAILsupersededcfd-DC00-20261024-r2/cfd/DC00B-R2/HX_DC00_M1.logsha256 cae7587d6d5f…OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded
DC00B-R1 baseline CFDCFD runABORTED after about 270 iterations by an automation fault (the watcher locked the solver log). Led to the rule: never read solver files during a solve.Native tool outputIESVE (MicroFlo CFD) 2026 (trial licence, internal evaluation)2026-10-24FAILexploratoryraw solver output store (not in the sealed evidence folder)OUTSTANDING — no engineer review or approval recorded

Engineering findings

  • Both final CFD runs converged natively: DC00B-R6 after 2,599 iterations and DC00O-R1 after 653, all 7 residuals at 1e-5.
  • All monitored rack inlets stayed within 18-27 °C in both designs: maximum 21.62 °C baseline, 21.49 °C optimised, 21.53 °C on the refined mesh.
  • The defensible statement is "no degradation with 12.5 % less supply air", not "cooler inlets".
  • The baseline flow field shows the floor jet short-circuiting to the ceiling extract above the cold aisle.
  • Annual simulations: 141,449 kWh/yr (baseline) vs 123,467 kWh/yr (optimised) cooling-system electricity; modelled difference 17,982 kWh/yr (12.7 %), SIMULATED WITH ASSUMED EQUIPMENT MODEL, upper bound (n = 2 gives 12,768 kWh/yr).
  • The independent energy audit matches IESVE and excludes Apache's whole-building difference (32,368 kWh/yr), which counts the fan saving twice.
  • DC-01 (synthetic 20 x 12 x 4 m hall, 100 kW): annual simulation N1F accepted at software level, 352,337 kWh/yr cooling-system electricity; N1D and N1E rejected by the gates.
  • The computed study status is NOT ENGINEERING VALIDATED.

Conclusions

  • As an automation proof of concept the study succeeded: Hexanta drove the CFD set-up, solving, validation gates, annual energy and reporting end to end, and both final native CFD runs converged (DC00B-R6, DC00O-R1).
  • With 12.5 % less supply air every monitored rack inlet stayed within 18-27 °C (maximum 21.62 °C baseline, 21.49 °C optimised): the defensible statement is no degradation, not cooler inlets.
  • The study is NOT ENGINEERING VALIDATED: the mass, energy-balance, boundary, plausibility and mesh gates failed, and the 12.7 % (17,982 kWh/yr) cooling-energy difference is an upper bound SIMULATED WITH ASSUMED EQUIPMENT MODEL, not a validated saving.

Limitations

  • Actual equipment performance curves are not modelled: SEER 4.0, SFP 1.5 W/(l/s) and fan law n = 3 are ASSUMED.
  • Racks are 0 W blocks with face boundaries and an imposed exhaust temperature (heat output follows inlet temperature; uniform faces; no bypass or leakage).
  • No complete CFD mass and energy balance: no solver flow report or field export; the energy balance is estimated from point samples only.
  • Baseline mesh independence not assessed (single grid); optimised top inlets not monotonic over three grids.
  • No independent solver benchmark or measured case.
  • The annual model is a single zone held at 28 °C and responds to airflow only through fan power; annual cooling energy is not validated.
  • Boundary values were read back from screenshots and table cells only, not programmatically.
  • The 18-27 °C inlet range comes from a public summary; the licensed current edition is not held.
  • The tariff (0.25 GBP/kWh) is an ASSUMED placeholder.
  • IESVE 2026 trial licence for internal evaluation only (expired 2026-10-25); commercial use would need a commercial licence and the vendor's written terms.

What this case study does not claim

  • Engineering validation, verification, review, approval or sign-off of any result.
  • The 17,982 kWh/yr (12.7 %, GBP 4,495/yr) figure as an achieved or validated saving; it is an upper bound with an assumed equipment model and tariff.
  • That the optimised design gives cooler rack inlets.
  • That mass or energy balance, or full mesh independence, was demonstrated.
  • Any CFD for DC-01, or any modelling of a real data centre, client or site: all data are synthetic.
  • Compliance with any licensed design guideline or standard.
  • A Hexanta CFD solver: the CFD was solved by IESVE MicroFlo; Hexanta prepared inputs, drove the software, parsed outputs and applied the gates.
  • Production-scale or commercially licensed automation: the runs were serial GUI automation on one test machine under a trial licence.
  • Apache's whole-building total difference (32,368 kWh/yr) as a saving.

Sanitised derivative of preserved evidence (cfd-DC00-20261024-r2, cfd-DC01-N1-DSM-20261024). Nothing was re-simulated. Screenshot crops are static images of the native viewer; plots and the report contain only values read from the evidence. · Pack cfd-data-centre-r2 (built 2026-10-25); every file is checked against its SHA-256 before it is shown.